Legal Opinion
Nipkow & Kobelt, Inc. v. North River Insurance
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 13, 1986No. 85 Civ. 535 (CHT)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TENNEY, District Judge.
This action concerns the interpretation of an insurance contract. The plaintiff, Nipkow & Kobelt, Inc., Parliament Textile Division (“Parliament”), instituted this diversity action to recover on a fire insurance policy (“policy”) issued by the defendant, The North River Insurance Co. (“North River”). In 1984, almost $600,000 of the plaintiff’s inventory was destroyed by a fire.
The defendant now moves for summary judgment, arguing that the fire occurred at a location which was not covered by plaintiff’s policy. The plaintiff contends that the policy covered its…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Annette Heyman v. Commerce and Industry Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Breed v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Seaboard Surety Co. v. Gillette Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Sutton v. East River Savings BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Bethlehem Steel Co. v. Turner Construction Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1957
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Industrial Chemical & Fiberglass Corp. v. The North River Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
- D.B. Orban Canada, Inc. v. New York Marine Managers, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1991
- Nipkow & Kobelt, Inc. v. North River InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1987
- Golden Eagle Liberia, Ltd. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1988
- Industrial Chemical & Fiberglass Corp. v. North River InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.