Legal Opinion

Nipkow & Kobelt, Inc. v. North River Insurance

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided May 7, 1987No. 85 Civ. 535 (CHT)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TENNEY, District Judge.

Nipkow & Kobelt, Inc., Parliament Textile Division (“Parliament” or “plaintiff”) instituted this diversity action to recover on a fire insurance policy (“policy”) issued by the defendant, The North River Insurance Co. (“North River” or “defendant”). In 1984, almost $600,000 of Parliament's inventory was destroyed by a fire. After it was notified of the loss, North River conducted an investigation and refused to pay the claim, contending that the location where the loss occurred was not covered by the policy.1 The plaintiff subsequently filed this motion to…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. WestlakeNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  3. Martin Fine v. Bellefonte Underwriters Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
  4. Bretton v. Mutual of Omaha InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  5. Bretton v. Mutual of Omaha InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1985

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kemelhor v. Penthouse International, Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1988
  2. Phillip Michael ScottUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2019
  3. Phillip Michael Scott v. AIG Property Casualty CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API