Legal Opinion
Chesapeake Appalachia, L.L.C. v. Scout Petroleum, LLC
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided December 19, 2014No. 4:14-CV-0620PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
MATTHEW W. BRANN, District Judge.
I. BACKGROUND:
The principal basis upon which a court may support its reasoning for granting a motion for reconsideration is an intervening change in the controlling law. In this case, Defendants ask the Court do the opposite and reconsider the undersigned’s application of a recent change in the controlling law, and, instead, revert to the former state of the law. The Court cannot ignore the current state of the law in this federal circuit. The motion will be denied.
Procedural History:
Plaintiff, Chesapeake Appalachia, LLC, hereinafter “Chesapeake,”…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Chesapeake Appalachia, LLC v. Scout Petroleum, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
- Chesapeake Appalachia, LLC v. SuppaDistrict Court, N.D. West Virginia · 2015
- A.E., Individually and as the Court Appointed Plenary Guardian for the Person and Estate of S.P. v. Mountain View School DistrictDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2026
- Adjei v. FinleyDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
- Ally v. MyersDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2023
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.