Legal Opinion

Painter v. Director of the State Department of Revenue

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 17, 1981No. 12006PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MAUS, Chief Judge.

The petitioner appeals from an adverse decision upon his application to set aside the revocation of his driver’s license for failure to take the breathalyzer test. His sole point of error is that the evidence is insufficient to establish that he refused to take the test within the meaning of § 577.050, RSMo 1978. This requires a summary of the evidence on this issue.

The principal arresting officer testified as follows: While the petitioner was being driven from the place of arrest to the police station, the officer advised the petitioner of the requirement that he take the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Spradling v. DeimekeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1975
  2. Krueger v. FultonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1969
  3. Harlan v. StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1973
  4. Stenzel v. State, Department of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. Thomas v. SchaffnerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1969

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Dudenhoeffer v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API