Liggett Spring & Axle Co. v. Michigan Buggy Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Kalamazoo; Buck, J. Assumpsit by the Liggett Spring & Axle Company against the Michigan Buggy Company for the breach of a contract to purchase goods. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.
The defendant is engaged in the manufacture of vehicles of various kinds at Kalamazoo, this State. It employs a great number of men, and keeps constantly on the road a large number of salesmen. It also has a branch salesroom at St. Paul, Minn., and many salesmen are sent out from that point. It has no facilities for making axles, but purchases them from manufacturers. Prior to September 17, 1892, it had purchased its axles from the Sheldon Axle Company, of Wilkesbarre, Pa. Many of these axles were made from special patterns, to be used on special styles of vehicles, and it was not possible to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Briesenmeister v. Supreme Lodge Knights of Pythias of the WorldMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
- Bailey v. Kalamazoo Publishing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1879
- Rosenbury v. AngellMichigan Supreme Court · 1859
- M'Hardy v. WadsworthMichigan Supreme Court · 1860
- Browne v. MooreMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Obenauer v. SolomonMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
- Beaman v. TestoriMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
- Town v. JepsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
- Trego v. AraveIdaho Supreme Court · 1911
- Grand Traverse Fruit & Produce Exchange v. Thomas Canning Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1918
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.