McAllister v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MARGOLIS, Senior Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on defendant’s Motion to Dismiss, filed February 27, 2012. The Court finds that plaintiff has failed to state a claim on which relief can be granted because the Federal Back Pay Act does not allow an attorney to directly sue for fees and because the Federal General Schedule is not a money-mandating source with respect to plaintiff. Thus, the Court grants defendant’s motion.
I. Background
Plaintiff Dennis P. McAlister is pro se. In his Amended Complaint, he alleges that he is an attorney admitted to practice in New York and that he…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Gerald Alan Brown, and Charles v. Darnell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- The United States v. Patrick J. ConnollyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Greenlee County, Arizona v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
- John Doe, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Adair v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Gonzalez v. Department of AgricultureDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2022