Legal Opinion

Burckholter v. Dentistry for You, 10-08-21 (4-6-2009)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided April 6, 2009No. 10-08-21PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

{¶ 1} Plaintiff-Appellants, Marie and Christopher Burckholter, appeal the judgment of the Mercer County Court of Common Pleas granting summary judgment in favor of Defendant-Appellees, Dentistry for You, Forsthoefel Young, Inc., and Harold Miracle. On appeal, the Burckholters contend that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment because genuine issues of material fact existed as to whether Defendant-Appellees had superior knowledge of a hazardous condition on their parking lot and created an unnatural accumulation of snow and ice. Based upon the following, we affirm the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Murphy v. City of ReynoldsburgOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Horton v. Harwick Chemical Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Horton v. Harwick Chem. Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1995

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Allen v. USA Parking Sys., Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. Arnett v. Archdiocese of CincinnatiOhio Court of Appeals · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API