Legal Opinion

Brinson v. . Lacy

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 28, 1928PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeogdeN, J.

Does a Torrens proceeding under C. S., ch. 47, entitled “Land Registration,” duly commenced prior to the enactment of chapter 31, Public Laws of 1919, constitute lis pendens?

Public Laws of 1919, chapter 31, adopted for the entire State what was known as the Buncombe County act relating to Us pendens, which provided for cross-indexing, and providing further: “From the cross-indexing of the notice of Us pendens only is the pendency of the action constructive notice to a purchaser or incumbrancer of the property affected thereby.” C. S., 502. The Torrens Act, C. S., 2378, declares: “The…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Jones v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  2. Collingwood v. . BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  3. Culbreth v. . HallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  4. Lamm v. . LammSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  5. Morgan v. Bostic.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Threlkeld v. Malcragson Land Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  2. Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance v. KnoxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API