Legal Opinion
Ex Parte Loveman, Joseph & Loeb
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided May 15, 1941No. 6 Div. 832PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BOULDIN, Justice.
“Either party to a civil suit, whether in a court of law, or in a court of equity * * * desiring the testimony of the other party, may file with the clerk or register interrogatories to be propounded to him, with an affidavit that the answers thereto will be material testimony for him in the cause.” Code of 1923, § 7764, Code 1940, Tit. 7, § 477.
If pertinent interrogatories are not answered within the time prescribed, the court may “attach the party and cause him to answer fully in open court” or may “direct a nonsuit or judgment by default * * * to be entered” &c. Code of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Nardone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- United States v. KnightSupreme Court of the United States · 1840
- State v. InmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
- State Ex Rel. Smith v. McCordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919
3Cited by9 opinions
- Thomas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1978
- City of Prichard v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
- LOUISVILLE & NASHVILLE RAILROAD COMPANY v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1963
- Ex parte State ex rel. GarrettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
- Ex parte Colonial Refrigerated Transportation, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1972
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.