Legal Opinion
Feldman v. Hanley
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 20, 1969No. Nos. 69 Civ. 772, 1262 and 1840PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LASKER, District Judge.
The three above-entitled class actions have been commenced by different stockholders of R. Hoe & Co. (“Hoe”) on behalf of themselves and all other stockholders; The defendants in each of these actions are Hoe, its officers and directors, and the accounting firm employed by Hoe (Lybrand, Ross Bros. & Montgomery). In addition, the plaintiffs in the Sherman action have named as defendants Blair & Co., Inc. (“Blair”), a broker-dealer, and Frederick and Martin Kalkstein, two of its registered representatives.
Pursuant to Rule 42(a), F.R.Civ.P., defendant Lybrand has moved for…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Johnson v. Manhattan Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
- MacAlister v. GutermaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958
- Fields v. WolfsonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1967
3Cited by16 opinions
- In Re Caesars Palace Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1973
- Guild Associates, Inc. v. Bio-Energy (Washington), LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2015
- Internet Law Library, Inc. v. Southridge Capital Management, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- In Re D'AvignonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Vermont · 1981
- Waldman v. Electrospace Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1975
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.