Legal Opinion · Dissent

Allen v. State

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided May 8, 1996No. CA CR 95-440Published

1DissentJohn Mauzy Pittman, Judge

The appellant in this case was found guilty by a jury of residential burglary. In reversing that conviction, the majority holds that appellant was entitled to an instruction on the lesser included offense of criminal trespass. I dissent primarily because there was no rational basis for the giving of such an instruction, but also because the issue was not properly preserved for appellate review.

To place the issue in perspective, I feel that it is necessary to briefly set out the evidence presented by the State, even though appellant failed to include such testimony in his abstract. The record…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. JonesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
  2. Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
  3. Grays v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
  4. Young v. YoungSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  5. Martin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API