Legal Opinion

Skarpness v. Port of Seattle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 12, 1958No. 34334PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFoster, J.

Respondents, plaintiffs below, recovered judgment against appellant, port of Seattle, defendant below, for loss by fire of fishing gear placed by them in lockers ■rented from appellant. The port of Seattle appeals:

The port of Seattle maintains a number of net sheds which are rented by commercial fishermen, who moor their vessels at the port’s facilities, to store their nets and other fishing gear.

The shed in question was of frame construction, two hundred fifty feet long, fifty feet wide and thirty feet high. It consisted of one large open room without interior walls, and was divided into…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Walsh v. West Coast Coal Mines, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Schrader v. KrieselSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  3. Kavafian v. Seattle Baseball Club Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Holt Ice & Cold Storage Co. v. Arthur Jordan Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1900
  5. Hubenette v. OstbySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Desco Corp. v. Harry W. Trushel Construction Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Brown v. DerryCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974
  3. ITT Rayonier, Inc. v. Puget Sound Freight LinesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1986
  4. Strain v. ChristiansSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Desco Corp. v. Harry W. Trushel Construction Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API