Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Hartford Fire Insurance

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 15, 1914PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Vermilion county; the Hon. E. R. E. Kjmbbough, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the April term, 1912.

1Per curiam

This was an action of assumpsit to recover upon a parol agreement to renew a fire insurance policy at the time of its expiration. The declaration contains one count, in substance, alleging that appellant, on the tenth day of December, 1909, entered into a certain agreement with appellee, in the nature of a fire insurance policy, which policy is set out in haec verba in the declaration, reciting therein that for the consideration of $48.36 the appellant insures Dr. Charles P. Wilson against loss by fire to the property, which is minutely described in the policy, for the aggregate sum of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Krieger v. Aurora, Elgin & Chicago RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Firemen's Insurance v. KuessnerIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Hartford Fire Insurance v. FarrishIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Continental Insurance v. RollerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1902
  5. Fire Ass'n of Philadelphia v. SmithAppellate Court of Illinois · 1895

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lumbermen's Mut. Ins. v. Slide Rule & Scale Engineering Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1949
  2. Lauhoff v. Automobile Ins. Co. of Hartford, Conn.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 1944
  3. Puntenney v. MantleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API