Legal Opinion
Rachel v. City of Mobile
District Court, S.D. Alabama
Decided June 5, 2015No. Civil Action No. 13-0522-WS-MPublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
WILLIAM H. STEELE, Chief Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the four remaining defendants’ motions for summary judgment. (Docs. 117, 123, 128, 133). The parties have filed briefs and evidentiary materials in support of their respective positions, (Docs. 118-21, 124-27, 129-32, 134-37, 141, 146-48, 150, 152, 155-57, 162-64), and the motions are ripe for resolution. After careful consideration, the Court concludes that two motions for summary judgment are due to be granted in their entirety and that the other two motions are due to be granted in part and denied in part.
BACKGROUND
In…
2Cases cited76 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Hope v. PelzerSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Shaw v. City of SelmaDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2017
- Clarke v. Tannin, Inc.United States Circuit Court · 2018
- Rogers v. City of SelmaDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2016
- Wheat v. Rogers & Willard, Inc.District Court, S.D. Alabama · 2017
- 68V BTR Holdings, LLC v. City of FairhopeDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2024
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.