Legal Opinion
Sugarman v. Glaser
New York Supreme Court
Decided May 18, 1970PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMax Bloom, J.
Plaintiffs, a firm of attorneys, bring this suit to recover for legal services alleged to have been rendered to G. A. L. Electro Mechanical Service.
The claim arises out of services rendered in connection with one of the controversies among the partners of G. A. L. Without endeavoring to set forth in full the background of that *1038controversy, let it suffice to say that in 1962 Herbert P. Glaser and Harold Leon were equal partners in G. A. L. In that year each of them entered into a trust agreement placing 22%% of his interest in trust for the benefit of his children, and naming his wife as…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ruzicka v. RagerNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
- Williams v. HartshornNew York Court of Appeals · 1946
- Taormina Corporation v. Antonio EscobedoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
- JOSCAR COMPANY v. Consolidated Sun Ray, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1963
- Eastern Metals Corporation v. MartinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1960
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re the Arbitration between Taylor & Health Care Employees, RWDSU, AFL-CIONew York Supreme Court · 1977
- Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. v. FreedAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- United States v. SteinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006