Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. v. Freed
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in granting that part of plaintiff’s motion seeking a default judgment on liability against Contractor Clearing Company and in denying the cross motion of defendant Rick Boyd seeking to compel plaintiff to accept an answer on behalf of Contractor Clearing Company. Both the summons ánd the caption of the complaint list the individual defendants “individually, and doing business as Contractor Clearing Company.” In the complaint, plaintiff alleges that…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Kyle v. FordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Klenk v. KentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Corsicana Ready Mix v. Trinity Metroplex Division, General, Portland, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1977
- Claim of Leeds v. County of WestchesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- De Witt v. Abraham Bros. Horse & Mule Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. v. FreedAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Case v. Cayuga CountyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009