Legal Opinion

Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. v. Freed

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 27, 2000PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in granting that part of plaintiff’s motion seeking a default judgment on liability against Contractor Clearing Company and in denying the cross motion of defendant Rick Boyd seeking to compel plaintiff to accept an answer on behalf of Contractor Clearing Company. Both the summons ánd the caption of the complaint list the individual defendants “individually, and doing business as Contractor Clearing Company.” In the complaint, plaintiff alleges that…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Kyle v. FordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  2. Klenk v. KentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  3. Corsicana Ready Mix v. Trinity Metroplex Division, General, Portland, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1977
  4. Claim of Leeds v. County of WestchesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. De Witt v. Abraham Bros. Horse & Mule Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. v. FreedAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  2. Case v. Cayuga CountyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API