Rainford v. United States
District Court, E.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER
COGAN, District Judge.
Noel Rainford, pro se, moves to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255, arguing that he received ineffective assistance of counsel be cause: (1) trial counsel failed to file a notice of appeal as instructed; (2) trial counsel prevented Rainford from testifying on his own behalf; and (3) trial counsel failed to investigate certain matters which could have led to impeachment of the government’s witnesses or additional evidence in Rainford’s favor. In addition, Rainford argues that he should have received a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Roe v. Flores-OrtegaSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- MacHibroda v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- John Chang v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Jorge RestrepoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Velasquez v. ErcoleDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2012