Legal Opinion

Webb v. Arrington

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided February 15, 1968No. [No. 102, September Term, 1967.]PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinan, J.

This appeal involves a distinction as old as the annals of husbandry, the difference between “fructus naturales” and “fructus industriales,” the dispute involving sod.

In March of 1963, Harry Webb died intestate and his 140 acre farm passed to his children and his widow as survivors. The widow deeded her interest to the children, Riggs T. Webb (appellants’ testator) and Mrs. Margaret W. Arrington (an appellee), so that each child thereafter held an undivided one-half interest in the farm as tenant in common.

Mr. Webb had maintained the farm for his father since 1947, and desired to remain on…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Israel v. IsraelCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1869
  2. Purner v. PiercyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1874
  3. State v. FowlerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1898
  4. Baltimore & Philadelphia Steamboat Co. v. Ministers of the Starr M. P. ChurchCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1925
  5. McLaughlin v. McLaughlinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1894

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wright v. VickaryousAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Clarke v. Alstores Realty Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API