Legal Opinion
Brock v. Lauritzen
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Decided September 30, 1986No. Civ. A. 84-C-980PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION and ORDER
TERENCE T. EVANS, District Judge.
Currently several motions are pending in this action, brought under the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 201, et seq.
On December 20,1985, 624 F.Supp. 966,1 granted the motion of the Secretary of Labor for partial summary judgment, determining that the migrant workers who pick cucumbers at defendants’ farm were employees of the defendants — rather than independent contractors — and thus were within the protection of the Act.
Eight months later, on August 14, 1986, defendants moved for relief from judgment pursuant to Rule 60(b)(6) of the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Leonard McKNIGHT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- John T. Dunlop, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Wayne DavisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- Brock v. LauritzenDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1985
- Hayes Brothers, Inc. v. Economy Fire & Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
- Beneficial Finance Co. v. WirtzCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1965
3Cited by6 opinions
- Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Michael Lauritzen and Marilyn Lauritzen, Individually and Doing Business as Lauritzen FarmsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
- Solis v. International Detective & Protective Service, Ltd.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2011
- Herman v. Brewah Cab, Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1998
- Reich v. ABC/York-Estes Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1994
- Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Michael Lauritzen and Marilyn Lauritzen, Individually and Doing Business as Lauritzen FarmsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.