Legal Opinion
Young v. Allstate Insurance
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided July 9, 2003No. CV-00-1607-PHX-JATPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
TEILBORG, District Judge.
Pending before the Court are two dis-positive motions: (1) Plaintiffs’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment Re: Bad Faith (Doc. # 93); and (2) Defendant’s Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. # 144). For the reasons set forth below, the Court will deny Plaintiffs’ Motion and grant Defendant’s Motion in part.
Background
Plaintiffs Sabrina Young and Lorenzo Young purchased an automobile insurance policy from Defendant Allstate Insurance Company that included uninsured motorist (“UM”) coverage. While insured under the policy, Ms. Young was involved in an automobile…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Taylor v. ListCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Lennar Corp. v. Transamerica InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
- Montoya Lopez v. Allstate InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2003
- Milhone v. Allstate InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2003
- Bjornstad Ex Rel. Thomas & Isis Davidson Family Trust v. Senior American Life InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2009
- Centeno v. American Liberty Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2019
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.