Legal Opinion

Powers v. Scholtens

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 24, 1890PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to superior court of Grand Rapids. (Burlingame, J.) Ejectment. Plaintiffs bring error. The facts are stated in the opinion. ' .

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

This is an action of ejectment, and rests entirely on the effect of the facts found; and the only question of any consequence is as to how far certain parties are affected by an old ejectment suit.

The condition is briefly this: The defendant holds under a title derived by mesne conveyances from one Emily O’Hara. The court below held this title was good to the land in controversy, unless Mrs. O’Hara was bound by a judgment against a former tenant, one Patrick Britton. The dispute arose whether the parcel in controversy was in the N. E. £ or in the N. W. £ of section 36, in town 7 N., of range…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mason v. KelloggMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Hines v. Estate of JenkinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1887

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Nieter v. McCaull-Dinsmore Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  2. Sanford v. TannerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  3. Collins v. Township of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API