Powers v. Scholtens
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to superior court of Grand Rapids. (Burlingame, J.) Ejectment. Plaintiffs bring error. The facts are stated in the opinion. ' .
1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.
This is an action of ejectment, and rests entirely on the effect of the facts found; and the only question of any consequence is as to how far certain parties are affected by an old ejectment suit.
The condition is briefly this: The defendant holds under a title derived by mesne conveyances from one Emily O’Hara. The court below held this title was good to the land in controversy, unless Mrs. O’Hara was bound by a judgment against a former tenant, one Patrick Britton. The dispute arose whether the parcel in controversy was in the N. E. £ or in the N. W. £ of section 36, in town 7 N., of range…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Mason v. KelloggMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
- Hines v. Estate of JenkinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
3Cited by3 opinions
- Nieter v. McCaull-Dinsmore Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- Sanford v. TannerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
- Collins v. Township of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1896