Collins v. Township of Grand Rapids
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Kent; Adsit, J. Assumpsit by Hiram Collins against the township of Grand Rapids to recover a balance due on a contract for improving a highway. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.
The plaintiff has sued the township of Grand Rapids to recover abalance due upon a contract *676made and performed by bis assignor, whereby he was to make certain street improvements on a street or highway constituting the boundary between said township and the city of Grand Rapids. This contract was made in the course of proceedings taken under certain local statutes authorizing the city of Grand Rapids and adjacent townships to unite in the improvement of highways lying between said city and townships. Act No. 313, Local Acts 1875; Act No. 353, Local Acts 1877. A special assessment was levied…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Aplin v. FisherMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
- Rens v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
- Mackey v. Township of ColumbusMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
- Powers v. ScholtensMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
- Fisher v. NaysmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
3Cited by4 opinions
- City of Detroit v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
- State ex rel. Clancy v. PorterNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1917
- MacOmb Building Co. v. Clinton TownshipMichigan Supreme Court · 1944
- Londoner v. City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1911