Aiken Petroleum Co. v. National Petroleum Under Writers of Western Millers Mut. Fire Ins.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Per curiam
This action, based upon the amended and supplemental complaint, was brought to reform and to enforce as reformed, an insurance policy issued by the de fendant in 1943, covering certain properties owned by the plaintiffs which were destroyed by fire on October 20, 1943. The reformation sought is the elimination from the policy in question, and also from a policy written in 1942, of a one hundred per cent, co-insurance clause, which 'the plaintiffs allege was improperly, inequitably and fraudulently inserted. The general theory of the complaint is based upon the doctrine of imputed knowledge,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- The Distilled SpiritsSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Atlantic Cotton Mills v. Indian Orchard MillsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
- Armstrong v. AshleySupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Gaskins v. Firemen's Ins. Co. of Newark, N.J.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1945
- Hood v. Life Casualty Ins. Co. of Tenn.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1934
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Fuller v. Eastern Fire & Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1962
- Fireman's Fund Indemnity Co. v. Boyle General Tire Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1965
- St. Louis Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. WitneyDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1951
- Crewe v. BlackmonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
- L. C. Bates Co. v. Austin, Nichols & Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.