Legal Opinion

Stientjes Family Trust v. Thurston County

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided October 12, 2009No. 63865-3-IPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

217 P.3d 379 (2009)

Harlan Claire STIENTJES FAMILY TRUST and Mary Jo Stientjes, Respondents,

v.

THURSTON COUNTY, Defendant, and

Laressa Via-Fourre and Charles Via, Appellants.

No. 63865-3-I.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.

October 12, 2009.

Harlan C. Stientjes, Attorney at Law, Olympia, WA, for Respondents.

Paul J. Hirsch, Attorney at Law, Manchester, WA, for Appellants.

DWYER, A.C.J.

¶ 1 Pursuant to the Land Use Petition Act (LUPA), chapter 36.70C RCW, a court may review a local government's land use decision only if the decision is final. A land use decision is final when it leaves nothing…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. McKart v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Wenatchee Sportsmen Ass'n v. Chelan CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  3. South Hollywood Hills Citizens Ass'n v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Watch v. Skagit CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Chelan County v. NykreimWashington Supreme Court · 2002

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wanthida Chandrruangphen, App V. City Of Sammamish, RespCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2024
  2. End The Prison Industrial Complex v. City Of SeattleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
  3. Scott Blomenkamp v. City Of EdmondsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API