Legal Opinion

Town of Bath v. Norman

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 18, 1946PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSeawell, J.

Tbe movent has attacked tbe judgment of May Term, 1945, purporting to be by consent, on tbe ground tbat tbe signatory party bad no authority to give such consent in its behalf. If it can make good on tbat challenge, all other matters brought forward in tbe record are irrelevant. In fact, it is, and was, tbe only point for consideration on tbe motion initially and throughout tbe bearing, since absence of authority to consent would deprive tbe judgment of any sort of validity. A careful consideration and analysis of tbe record leads us to tbe conclusion tbat denial of plaintiff’s motion to…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. City of Monroe v. NivenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  2. King v. . KingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  3. Harris v. . BennettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  4. Duffer v. . BrunsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  5. Insurance Co. v. . Guilford CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Moore v. HumphreySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  2. Howard v. BoyceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  3. City of Atlanta v. BlackSupreme Court of Georgia · 1995
  4. Owens v. VoncannonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  5. Iredell County Board of Education v. DicksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API