Legal Opinion

Commonwealth Edison Co. v. Westinghouse Electric Co.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided February 28, 1991No. 90 C 6593PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

KOCORAS, District Judge:

This matter comes before the court on Plaintiff Commonwealth Edison Company’s (“Edison”) motion to remand this case to state court. For the following reasons, the motion is granted.

BACKGROUND

The following are the facts as alleged by Edison, and for purposes of this motion these facts are taken as true. In 1967 and 1971 Edison contracted with Westinghouse Electric Company (“Westinghouse”) to buy twenty four steam generators for three of Edison’s nuclear generating stations, Zion, Byron, and Braidwood. Westinghouse represented to Edison that these steam…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Owen Equipment & Erection Co. v. KrogerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Aldinger v. HowardSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Finley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. John Jones v. General Tire & Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
  5. Harbor Insurance Company v. Continental Bank CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Alber v. Illinois Department of Mental Health & Developmental DisabilitiesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1992
  2. American Inmate Phone Systems, Inc. v. US Sprint Communications Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1992
  3. Bromenn Healthcare v. Northwestern National Life InsuranceDistrict Court, C.D. Illinois · 1992
  4. Ashenden v. Lloyd's of LondonDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1996
  5. Casey v. Hinckley & Schmitt, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API