Legal Opinion

Buxton v. Howard

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1871PublishedCited by 5 opinions

APPEAL from the Shelby Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtWorden, C. J.

An action ' was pending in the court below between the appellees as plaintiffs and appellants as defendants. Pending the cause, the appellees filed in the court below a bond executed by the appellants for the submission of certain matters to arbitration, together with the award of the arbitrators, and, on proper proof being fur*110nished for that purpose, procured a rule against the appellants to show cause why the court should not confirm the award and render judgment thereon. The bond and award are as follows:

“We, Benjamin Buxton and Jacob Churchman, are bound to James Howard and James McCally,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Allen v. HillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1856

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Maryland Electric Railway Co. v. BeasleyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1912
  2. Angell Enterprises, Inc. v. Abram & Hawkins Excavating Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. Spencer v. CurtisIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Russell v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Angell Enterprises, Inc. v. Abram & Hawkins Excavating Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API