Legal Opinion

Blackwell v. National Fire Ins. Co. of Hartford

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 28, 1951No. 607PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Issuance of the policy and loss as claimed were admitted, but defendants denied liability on the ground that the loss occurred while the insured was transporting in the automobile intoxicating liquor in violation of law and endeavoring to escape arrest. However, the policy contains no exception on this ground, and as the loss comes within the terms of the insurance policy, as issued and paid for, this defense will not avail the defendants. Poole v. Ins. Co., 188 N.C. 468, 125 S.E. 8. The insurance contract had no direct connection with the violation of law admitted, but was only collateral…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Electrova Co. v. Spring Garden InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  2. Poole v. Imperial Mutual Life & Health InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Eisenman v. HORNBERGERSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  2. Allstate Insurance v. PattersonDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1995
  3. Barrino v. Radiator Specialty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  4. Barrino v. Radiator Specialty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  5. Stewart v. Automobile Underwriters Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API