Rockefeller v. Purcell
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Dissent
John A. Fogleman, Justice.
Generally I agree with the views stated by Mr. Justice Byrd in his dissenting opinion, but I feel that there are other compelling reasons why action of (-he trial court should be affirmed.
The pleadings in this case indicate that the petitioners and appellants are three members of the State Board of Election Commissioners who brought the action in that capacity and as a class on behalf of the Republican party in Arkansas and three persons who claim title to the office of election commissioner in three counties in the state. The petition filed in the lower court was…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Skelly Oil Co. v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Bates & Guild Co. v. PayneSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- United States Ex Rel. Riverside Oil Co. v. HitchcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- United States Ex Rel. Ness v. FisherSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.