Legal Opinion
United States v. Abitibi-Consolidated Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided November 5, 2008No. Civil Action 07-1912 (RMC)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, District Judge.
Pursuant to Section 2(e)-(f) of the Antitrust Procedures and Penalties Act (the “Tunney Act”), 15 U.S.C. § 16(e)-(f), and with the consent of the Defendants, the United States moved for entry of a proposed Final Judgment in this civil antitrust action. The Newspaper Association of America (the “Association”) filed a memorandum opposing entry of the proposed Final Judgment. 1 After consideration of the parties’ briefs and the full record, the Court finds that the United States has shown that the proposed Final Judgment is in the public…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1983
- United States v. Microsoft Corporation. United States of America v. Microsoft CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
- United States v. SBC Communications, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- United States v. At&t Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2008
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. Keyspan Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- United States v. Iron Mountain, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- United States v. US Airways Group, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- United States v. StanleyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- United States v. Republic Services, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.