Legal Opinion

Helm v. Citizens to Protect the Prospect Area, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided October 29, 1993No. Nos. 92-CA-002774-MR, 92-CA-003008-MR, 92-CA-003009-MRPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

STUMBO, Judge:

These appeals arise from a zoning map amendment. The property involved is owned *313by Appellant, William Montfort Helm (hereinafter “Helm”), and he wants to commercially develop it. The Louisville and JeffersoCounty Planning Commission (hereinafter “Planning Commission”), which is not a party to this appeal, approved the proposed development. Then, Appellee, Prospect City Council (hereinafter “Council”), enacted an ordinance implementing the necessary map changes. Appellees, Citizens to Protect the Prospect Area, Inc., and John Kington (hereinafter “COPPA,” and “Kington,”…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rose v. Council for Better Education, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Minton v. Fiscal Court of Jefferson CountyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1992
  3. Farnsley v. HendersonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1951
  4. Glazier v. City of NewportCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Evangelical Lutheran Good Samaritan Society, Inc. v. Albert Oil Co.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API