Legal Opinion

Farnsley v. Henderson

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided February 23, 1951PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEWART, Justice.

This action for a declaration of rights under Sections 639a-l et seq. of the Civil Code of Practice was brought by appellee, Harvey E. Henderson, a taxpayer, for the purpose of determining whether a certain ordinance of the City of Louisville was legally enacted. Designated as Ordinance No. 75, Series 1950, and hereinafter referred to as “the ordinance,” it was an amendment to the existing employee classification and compensation ordinance of the City, and had the effect of raising the salaries of some thirty-three job classifications. The ordinance was introduced at the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. City of Monticello v. RaganCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1935

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Biltmore Hotel Court, Inc. v. City of Berry HillTennessee Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Ajamian v. Montgomery CountyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  3. Hourglass Lounge, Inc. v. City of Johnson CityCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1994
  4. State ex rel. Blackwell v. HatcherIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. Helm v. Citizens to Protect the Prospect Area, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API