Legal Opinion

Egan v. Mele

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 8, 1993No. 19 E.D. Appeal Docket 1993Published

1Opinion of the Court

535 Pa. 201 (1993)

634 A.2d 1074

Thomas C. EGAN, III,

v.

Mario MELE, Joseph M. Hoeffel, III and Jon D. Fox in their individual capacities as Montgomery County Commissioners, and collectively as the Montgomery County Commissioners.

Appeal of Ian BERG, by and through his parent and natural guardian, Philip J. BERG, Appellant.

Ian BERG, by and through his parent and natural guardian, Philip J. BERG, Appellant,

v.

MONTGOMERY COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Submitted April 30, 1993.

Decided November 8, 1993.

Philip J. Berg, Lafayette Hill, for appellant.

Edward T. Bresnan,…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Nix; Concurrence · Zappala; Dissent.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Petition of HughesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. In Re JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Commonwealth, State Ethics Commission v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. Egan v. MeleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. Egan v. MeleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API