Legal Opinion

Egan v. Mele

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 8, 1993No. 19 E.D. Appeal Docket 1993PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

CAPPY, Justice.

This opinion is filed in support of our Per Curiam Order dated May 7, 1993, 533 Pa. 347, 625 A.2d 610, reversing the Orders of the Court of Common Pleas of Montgomery County striking Appellant Ian Berg’s nominating petitions for the office of District Justice in Magisterial District 38-1-23 and dismissing Appellant’s Complaint in Mandamus. The Per Curiam Order further directed Appellee Montgomery County Board of Elections to place the name of Appellant Ian Berg on the Democratic and Republican ballots for the office of District Justice in Magisterial…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Petition of HughesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. In Re JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Commonwealth, State Ethics Commission v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. Egan v. MeleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. SpanoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  2. Berg v. EganDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1997
  3. Commonwealth v. SpanoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  4. In re Nomination Petition of WarrenCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  5. In re Candidacy of ElliottCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API