Legal Opinion

Brady v. City and County of Denver

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 9, 1973No. C-230PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hodges

We granted certiorari to review the holding in Powell v. Brady, 30 Colo. App. 406, 496 P.2d 328 that tort-feasors seeking indemnity from a municipality as to secondary injuries caused by negligent care of an accident victim in a municipal hospital are subject to the ninety-day notice requirement of C.R.S. 1963, 139-35-1(1).

We agree with the conclusion reached by the Colorado Court of Appeals on the facts of this case and we therefore affirm its judgment.

This precise issue has not been the subject of any previous Colorado Supreme Court opinion. However, our primary reason for granting…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rosane v. SengerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1944
  2. Powell v. BradyColorado Court of Appeals · 1972
  3. Wilson v. City and County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1969

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Palmer v. AH Robins Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  2. Union Supply Co. v. PustSupreme Court of Colorado · 1978
  3. People Ex Rel. Department of Transportation v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Barnes v. LopezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
  5. Technical Computer Services, Inc. v. BuckleyColorado Court of Appeals · 1992

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API