Legal Opinion

Coatsworth v. Ray

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 1898PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from municipal court of Buffalo. Action by Beuben H. Coatsworth against Harriet Bay. Two judgments were entered, one for plaintiff for the amount of the verdict,, and the other for defendant for costs. Plaintiff appeals from both.

1Opinion of the CourtLaughlin, J.

The plaintiff brought this action in the municipal court of Buffalo to recover of the defendant a balance of $40 for rent of premises on Otto street, in the city of Buffalo, and $33.44 in addition thereto, being for a balance of taxes and assessments on said premises which the plaintiff claims the defendant should have paid. *499The defendant duly offered judgment for $40, which plaintiff refused to accept. ' The case was tried before a jury, and a verdict was rendered in favor of the plaintiff for the $40 item of rent and interest thereon only. Thereupon two judgments were entered,—one in favor…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Schuyler v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  2. Rector, Etc., of Trinity Church v. . HigginsNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  3. Clarke v. . HowlandNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  4. Sayles v. KerrAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
  5. Noble v. ThayerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. A. Stern & Co. v. Avedon & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920
  2. Woods v. Bank of HaywardsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
  3. Clifford v. Smith Meat Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API