Upper Southampton Township. v. Upper Southampton Township Zoning Hearing Board
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Justice CASTILLE.
We granted review in this appeal from the Commonwealth Court to explore the question of whether the construction of billboards qualifies as “land development” for purposes of the Municipalities Planning Code, 53 P.S. § 10107 (“MPC”), and the Upper Southampton-Township Subdivision and Land Development Ordinance § 202 (“SALDO”), thereby authorizing a township to require land development approval before the billboards can be erected. We hold that the term “land development” does not encompass the construction of billboards and, therefore, we reverse the Commonwealth Court.
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Pennsylvania Financial Responsibility Assigned Claims Plan v. EnglishSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Commonwealth v. Gilmour Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- O'ROURKE v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- In Re Canvass of Absentee Ballots of Nov. 4, 2003 General ElectionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Ramich v. Worker's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Commonwealth v. DiodoroSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Giuliani v. Springfield TownshipDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2017
- Lamar Advertising Co. v. Zoning Hearing Board of the Municipality of MonroevilleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Global Tower, LLC v. Hamilton TownshipDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
- Anter Assocs. v. Zoning Hr'g Bd. of ConcordCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.