Legal Opinion · Dissent

Cadle Co. v. Castle

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided October 24, 1995No. 05-94-00816-CVPublished

1DissentJames, Justice

The majority reverses the trial court’s judgment enforcing a mediated settlement agreement between the parties. I respectfully dissent. Under the facts of this case, I would conclude the trial court can enforce a mediated settlement agreement through a summary proceeding. I would hold the trial court’s actions were proper. I would affirm the trial court’s judgment.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

Frank Castle (Castle) executed a note payable to Deposit Insurance Bridge Bank. Bank One, Texas, N.A. (Bank One) purchased the loan. Bank One filed suit against Castle when he defaulted on the note. The Cadle…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Texas Ass'n of Business v. Texas Air Control BoardTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Roark v. AllenTexas Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Padilla v. LaFranceTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  4. RepublicBank Dallas, N.A. v. Interkal, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Houston First American Savings v. MusickTexas Supreme Court · 1983

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API