Legal Opinion

Zalkind v. Scheinman

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided December 24, 1942Published

1Opinion of the Court

BONDY, District Judge.

The complaint alleges as a first cause of action the infringement by each of the defendants of several letters patent issued to the plaintiff.

As a second cause of action it repeats every allegation made in the first cause of action and alleges further that the defendants caused to be filed applications for letters patent for the subject matter of plaintiff’s inventions, that they created invalid and improper interferences in the Patent Office and contested the validity and infringement of the patents with the fraudulent intent of obtaining the benefits of plaintiff’s…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hurn v. OurslerSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Armstrong Paint & Varnish Works v. Nu-Enamel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Musher Foundation, Inc. v. Alba Trading Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
  4. Treasure Imports, Inc. v. Henry Amdur & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
  5. Foster D. Snell, Inc. v. PottersCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API