W. H. Armstrong & Co. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1DissentWhaley, Chief Justice
I cannot agree with the majority opinion.
Article 3 of the contract provides for orders of the contracting oflicer involving changes to be in writing and when the order for a change is over $500.00 the written approval of the head of the department shall be necessary. Article 5 of the contract provides that no charge for any extra work or material will be allowed unless the same had been ordered in writing by the contracting officer and the price stated in the order.
*532Plaintiff claims a change was made involving thousands of dollars. No written order for the change was ever issued, by the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hawkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- United States v. Callahan Walker Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Plumley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- United States v. R. P. Andrews & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
- St. Louis Hay & Grain Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.