State v. Smith
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
Knudson, j.:
Isaac E. Smith appeals the denial of his motion for new trial based upon ineffective assistance of counsel. There are two issues presented for our consideration: (a) Does this court have jurisdiction to consider Smith’s appeal; and (b) did the trial court err in denying Smith’s motion?
The parties agree and the record establishes that Smith did not file his motion in a timely manner. Consequently, we must first consider whether the trial court had jurisdiction to consider Smith’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. K.S.A. 22-3501 states that a motion for new trial on…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Chamberlain v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 1985
- State v. GardnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1998
- Winter v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 1972
- State v. TorranceCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1996
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. RequenaCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2001