Legal Opinion

State v. Smith

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided March 3, 2000No. 81,822PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Knudson, j.:

Isaac E. Smith appeals the denial of his motion for new trial based upon ineffective assistance of counsel. There are two issues presented for our consideration: (a) Does this court have jurisdiction to consider Smith’s appeal; and (b) did the trial court err in denying Smith’s motion?

The parties agree and the record establishes that Smith did not file his motion in a timely manner. Consequently, we must first consider whether the trial court had jurisdiction to consider Smith’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. K.S.A. 22-3501 states that a motion for new trial on…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Chamberlain v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 1985
  3. State v. GardnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1998
  4. Winter v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 1972
  5. State v. TorranceCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1996

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. RequenaCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API