Legal Opinion

Bermann v. Windale Properties, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 1, 1957PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action for a judgment declaring the rights of the parties under a certain agreement, the parties appeal from an order insofar as it denies their respective motions for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to rule 112 of the Rules of Civil Practice. The agreement, entered into between plaintiffs and defendant’s predecessor in title, gave plaintiffs the right to install washing machines and driers in the premises now owned by defendant. Defendant has demanded that plaintiffs remove their machines, although the term of the agreement has not expired. Order affirmed, without costs. We agree…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. HorowitzNew York Court of Appeals · 1956
  2. Stevens v. AmsinckAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
  3. General Meter Service Corp. v. Manufacturers Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Todd v. KrolickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  2. Todd v. KrolickNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. New York Credit Men's Adjustment Bureau v. Samuel Breiter & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958
  4. Todd v. KrolickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API