Legal Opinion · Dissent
Todd v. Krolick
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 28, 1983Published
1DissentLevine, J.
Levine, J. (dissenting). I respectfully dissent. The agreement between plaintiff and defendants’ predecessor in interest created more than a revocable license. It gave plaintiff the right, exclusive against the owner of the fee and third persons, to install and maintain coin-operated washing and drying machines at a specifically designated apartment building in the City of Saratoga Springs. Incidental thereto, it also gave plaintiff the right to draw water and electricity from the building’s power and water lines and to connect with its sewer line for waste disposal. These property-related…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Neponsit Property Owners' Ass'n v. Emigrant Industrial Savings BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
- Trustees of Columbia College v. LynchNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
- Equitable Life Assurance Society v. BrennanNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
- Saratoga State Waters Corp. v. . PrattNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
- Nicholson v. 300 Broadway Realty Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1959
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.