Diesen v. Cox
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtHilton, J.
The parties to this action are attorneys practicing law at Clo-quet, Minnesota. Defendants are copartners. This action, commenced in May, 1928, was for an accounting on an alleged verbal copartnership agreement claimed to have been made between plaintiff and the defendants in 1919. It was tried to the court without a jury in December, 1928, and lasted many days.
Findings of fact and conclusions of law, all favorable to defendants, were made on July 23, 1930. In November of that year plaintiff made a motion to amend the findings of fact and conclusions of law and an alternative motion for a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Walker v. PattersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
- McCool v. DavisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- Hall v. DavisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
- McCool v. DavisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925