Legal Opinion
Blazquez v. Pennsylvania Financial Responsibility Assigned Claims Plan
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided July 28, 2000PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CIRILLO, President Judge Emeritus:
¶ 1 Luis Blazquez appeals from the order entered in the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County. We affirm.
¶ 2 Luis Blazquez was struck by an unidentified taxicab while riding his bicycle. He timely submitted an official accident report to PennDOT,1 and sought compensation for his injuries under the Pennsylvania Financial Responsibility Assigned Claims Plan (the Plan). The Plan denied benefits, concluding that Blazquez had failed to report the accident to a proper governmental authority as required by the Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law. See…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Jackson v. Pennsylvania Financial Responsibility Assigned Claims PlanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Gunter v. Constitution State Service Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Shoyer Et Ux. v. City of Phila.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Owens v. the Travelers Ins. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
3Cited by5 opinions
- Niehaus v. Cowles Business Media, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. FosterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Kelley v. McGrail, No. Cv-00-0599469s (Jan. 30, 2002)Connecticut Superior Court · 2002
- SIMMS v. NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURERS INSURANCE COMPANYDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2023
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. FosterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005