Legal Opinion

John Arnzen, III v. Charles Palmer

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided April 22, 2013No. 12-3634PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Circuit Judge.

Patients at the Iowa Civil Commitment Unit for Sex Offenders (CCUSO) filed a complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1988 challenging the placement of video cameras in CCUSO restrooms, and moved for a preliminary injunction to stop their use. The district court 1 denied the motion as to cameras in the “dormitory style restrooms” (restrooms with multiple toilets, showers and sinks) but granted a preliminary injunction ordering that cameras in the “traditional style bathrooms” (bathrooms with a single toilet, sink, and shower) be pointed at the ceiling or covered with a lens cap. The…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Youngberg v. Romeo Ex Rel. RomeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Brigham City v. StuartSupreme Court of the United States · 2006

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Karsjens v. PiperDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2018
  2. Peters v. Woodbury CountyDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2013
  3. Rasmusson v. Chisago CountyDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2014
  4. Karsjens v. JessonDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2014
  5. United States v. Gregory StephenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2021

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API