John Arnzen, III v. Charles Palmer
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ARNOLD, Circuit Judge.
Patients at the Iowa Civil Commitment Unit for Sex Offenders (CCUSO) filed a complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1988 challenging the placement of video cameras in CCUSO restrooms, and moved for a preliminary injunction to stop their use. The district court 1 denied the motion as to cameras in the “dormitory style restrooms” (restrooms with multiple toilets, showers and sinks) but granted a preliminary injunction ordering that cameras in the “traditional style bathrooms” (bathrooms with a single toilet, sink, and shower) be pointed at the ceiling or covered with a lens cap. The…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Youngberg v. Romeo Ex Rel. RomeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Brigham City v. StuartSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Karsjens v. PiperDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2018
- Peters v. Woodbury CountyDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2013
- Rasmusson v. Chisago CountyDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2014
- Karsjens v. JessonDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2014
- United States v. Gregory StephenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2021
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.