State v. Churchill
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
BARRETT, Commissioner.
Jack George Churchill has been found guilty of robbery in the first degree and sentenced to five years’ imprisonment. Upon this appeal his assignment of error that the verdict is against the law and the weight of the evidence preserves nothing for review, V.A.M.S. § 547.030; 42 V.A. M.S.Sup.Ct.Rule 27.20; nevertheless, other assignments relating to instructions and to the trial court’s failure to sustain his motions for judgment of acquittal require consideration of the essential merits of his conviction.
From the state’s evidence the jury could find that on the evening…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Allen v. St. Louis Public Service CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
- State v. BurtonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1946
- State v. HandsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1953
- State v. ParkerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1914
- State v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1939
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- State v. CobbSupreme Court of Missouri · 1969
- State v. KeebleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1966
- State v. JaegerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
- State v. CheathamSupreme Court of Missouri · 1960
- State v. MaxwellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1964
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.