Legal Opinion

Deweese v. Hutton

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 3, 1896No. 17,741PublishedCited by 4 opinions

From the Fulton Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHackney, C. J.

The appellants, Deweese, Dudgeon and Lovatt, as the board of commissioners of Fulton county, and Godman, a contractor with said board for the repairs of a certain bridge in said county, were sued by the appellees, tax payers of said county, to restrain the performance of a contract.

There were two paragraphs of complaint which are here questioned for -the first time. It is only where the complaint, as an entirety is bad, that its sufficiency *116can be questioned for the first time in this court. Ashton v. Shepherd, 120 Ind. 69; Branch v. Faust, 115 Ind. 464; Ludlow, Guard., v. Ludlow, 109 Ind.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Branch v. FaustIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Board of Commissioners v. AllmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Owen v. PhillipsIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  4. City of Indianapolis v. Indianapolis Gas-Light & Coke Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1879
  5. Driftwood Valley Turnpike Co. v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1880

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Zuelly v. CasperIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Karr v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Miller v. BowersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1902
  4. Bloomfield Democrat, Inc. v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API