In the Interest of M.F.
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
Rulon, C.J.:
S.F., the biological mother of M.F., appeals the termination of her parental rights to M.F., arguing the district court failed to follow the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA), 25 U.S.C. § 1901 et seq. (2006), in the proceedings which ultimately resulted in the termination of S.F.’s parental rights. We conclude the ICWA *928was not properly followed and reverse and remand for further proceedings.
On November 6, 2006, the State filed a petition alleging M.F. was a child in need of care (CINC). At that time, the State had no information regarding whether M.F. had Native American heritage.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In the Interest of B.D.-Y.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2008
- In the Interest of M.B.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2008
- In re A.P.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1998
- In re S.M.H.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2005
3Cited by6 opinions
- In The Interest of M.F.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2010
- Monroe County Department of Human Services v. Luis R.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2009
- PeopleColorado Court of Appeals · 2013
- In re Interest of Audrey T.Nebraska Court of Appeals · 2019
- In Re MFCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.