Legal Opinion

In the Interest of M.F.

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided May 1, 2009No. 100,845PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rulon, C.J.:

S.F., the biological mother of M.F., appeals the termination of her parental rights to M.F., arguing the district court failed to follow the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA), 25 U.S.C. § 1901 et seq. (2006), in the proceedings which ultimately resulted in the termination of S.F.’s parental rights. We conclude the ICWA *928was not properly followed and reverse and remand for further proceedings.

On November 6, 2006, the State filed a petition alleging M.F. was a child in need of care (CINC). At that time, the State had no information regarding whether M.F. had Native American heritage.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In the Interest of B.D.-Y.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2008
  2. In the Interest of M.B.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2008
  3. In re A.P.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1998
  4. In re S.M.H.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2005

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In The Interest of M.F.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2010
  2. Monroe County Department of Human Services v. Luis R.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2009
  3. PeopleColorado Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. In re Interest of Audrey T.Nebraska Court of Appeals · 2019
  5. In Re MFCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API