RPM v. State, Department of Family Services, Division of Public Assistance & Social Services

GOLDEN, Chief Justice.

We review appellant RPM’s contention that the district court erred in determining, in this paternity action, RPM’s liability for past and future child support without RPM having been afforded a meaningful opportunity to be heard.

We reverse and remand.

RPM raises these issues:

I. Whether the district court violated the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution and Article 1 § 6 of the Constitution of the State of Wyoming in denying the Appellant an opportunity to be heard?

II. Whether the district court erred (abused its discretion) in refusing to…